|
Question : Changing to correct/recommend DNS setup
|
|
Current Setup
All DNS servers show this setup and all Zones in all domains are Active Directory - Integrated Primary
_msdcs.domain.local dc domains gc pdc cle.domain.local _msdcs _sites _tcp _udp domaindnszones cin.domain.local _msdcs _sites _tcp _udp domaindnszones domain.local _sites _tcp _udp cin cle domaindnszones forestdnszones
I think this setup is incorrect and it should be setup like this.
On the DNS server for domain.local
_msdcs.domain.local - Active Directory - Integrated Primary (replicate only within domain) dc domains gc pdc cin.domain.local - Secondary _msdcs _sites _tcp _udp domaindnszones cle.domain.local - Secondary _msdcs _sites _tcp _udp domaindnszones domain.local - Active Directory - Integrated Primary (replicate only within domain) _sites _tcp _udp cin - Delegation to Child Server cle - Delegation to Child Server domaindnszones forestdnszones
On DNS server for cle.domain.local servers
_msdcs.domain.local - Secondary dc domains gc pdc cin.domain.local - Secondary _msdcs _sites _tcp _udp domaindnszones cle.domain.local - Active Directory - Integrated Primary (replicate only within domain) _msdcs _sites _tcp _udp domaindnszones domain.local - Secondary _sites _tcp _udp cin cle domaindnszones forestdnszones
Does this seem correct? That only the zone for the particular domain is AD Integrated? Please let me know if my thinking is correct on this.
Also, I was doing some testing and it appears that if I change a zone (on a child domain dns server for example) from AD Integrated Primary to Secondary it will replicate a deletion of that zone to all the DNS servers in the forest. So, along those lines, what issues should I look out for when converting our DNS implementation to the correct seutp?
|
Answer : Changing to correct/recommend DNS setup
|
|
There's really no reason not to leave all the zones as AD integrated. With integrated zones the dns info is stored in AD versus in a local file...all dns replication is part of your standard AD replication; versus the primary/secondary zone single-master method of zone transfers (sometimes problematic =). There are several benefits to using AD integrated zones and your current setup is definitely not incorrect.
The one caveat being that only domain controllers running DNS can host the integrated zones. If you have DNS running on any member servers then you'd need to use Standard Secondary zones on them...with one of the Active Directory integrated primary servers acting as the master.
|
|
|