|
Question : Cisco IOS: Problem with adding a secondary IP address
|
|
I've got a Cisco 2600 router running IOS 12.1. I want to add a second subnet to ethernet port 0. I added the subnet, 192.168.100.0/24 as the secondary. The configuration looks like:
interface Ethernet0 description Plymouth Private segment ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 200.100.50.1 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 100 out
or graphically,
Router | | Network A address = 200.100.50.1 | Network B address = 192.168.100.1 | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | Host A 200.100.50.2 Host B 192.168.100.100
The router can successfully ping both hosts. Host A can successfully ping the router Host B can successfully ping the router
Host A cannot ping Host B Host B cannot ping Host A (or anything other than the router, which is the only other device on Network B so far)
When I do a show ip route, both subnets show as being directly connected to ethernet0. Do I have a routing problem, an access-list problem, or something I don't know to ask about problem?
|
Answer : Cisco IOS: Problem with adding a secondary IP address
|
|
Why would the router do routing in this case ?
200.x.x.1 address is a public address & 192.168.x.1 address is a private address.
Routing wouldn't happen unless one of them is made into same class by NAT.
Cheers, Rajesh
|
|
|
|